[meersbrook-house] meersbrook-house Digest, Vol 1, Issue 18

[Anthony Ashton]

I don't think we need a hard and fast rule either, just an eye on keeping
it manageable so that subgroups don't get swamped by people turning up on
spec. I think when we've identified the skillsets/enthusiasm of people,
we'll have a better idea of how to go about things. We shouldn't forget
that planning as is is really for the meeting pencilled in for September at
which point we'll have a better involvement and representation from people
who don't even know about this entire situation yet.


On 28 June 2014 13:49, Joyce M Bullivant <1duckweed at live.co.uk> wrote:

> Possibly re group size and openess. Perhaps thing is not to make it hard
> and fast rule to always be limited to say 6, but if someone with a special
> interest skill expertise wants to sit on the subgroup for that one meeting
> then can be done.  Some people may not be able to attend all subgroups or
> even want to but there may be a specific issue on the agenda come up that
> might be helped by that person's involvement?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> meersbrook-house mailing list
> meersbrook-house at email-lists.org
> https://www.email-lists.org/mailman/listinfo/meersbrook-house
>
>


-- 
Kind regards
Anthony Ashton

Office - (0114) 383 0114
Mobile - (07738) 150 322

www.technologikal.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.email-lists.org/pipermail/meersbrook-house/attachments/20140628/12b65333/attachment.html>