[ptx] cvs optimizer not stable?

[Ed Halley]

Yes, this is a partial pano (three handhelds) but no, it wasn't jumping
to zero or near-zero.  Each pass would shrink the overall stitch by 40%
(roughly), and push the images lower in pitch.  The fit was still
visually good.  True for Rectilinear or Equirectangular optimizations.

If I switched to just optimize Y,P,R,B it would remain stable:  each
pass would return the same results and the images wouldn't "move" in
pano space.

On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 20:27, Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Ed Halley wrote:
> 
> > 
> > False alarm.  Sorry.  "Everything" had problems a week ago, too.  The
> > FOV keeps getting optimized farther and farther out, incorrectly.
> 
> you mean the HFOV (v) of the images? so far i have only seen it shrinking
> down to zero, for some partial panoramas, especially when the project is not
> already optimized quite well.
> 
> ciao
>   Pablo
> --
> http://wurm.wohnheim.uni-ulm.de/~redman/
> Please use PGP
-- 
[ e d @ h a l l e y . c c ]