[meersbrook-house] meersbrook-house Digest, Vol 3, Issue 18

Joyce M Bullivant 1duckweed at live.co.uk
Tue Aug 19 12:05:30 GMT 2014


I think as we already have made a press release this is irrelevant Nick. All I am asking for is the copy of what has already gone out so I can pass the same release to Nick Robinson, Norton Parish magazine etc. Just want to make sure all statements have uniformity.   
> From: meersbrook-house-request at email-lists.org> Subject: meersbrook-house Digest, Vol 3, Issue 18
> To: meersbrook-house at email-lists.org
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 12:00:25 +0000
> 
> Send meersbrook-house mailing list submissions to
> 	meersbrook-house at email-lists.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://www.email-lists.org/mailman/listinfo/meersbrook-house
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	meersbrook-house-request at email-lists.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	meersbrook-house-owner at email-lists.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of meersbrook-house digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. re publicity (Joyce M Bullivant)
>    2. Re: re publicity (Nick Roscoe)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:20:36 +0100
> From: Joyce M Bullivant <1duckweed at live.co.uk>
> To: "meersbrook-house at email-lists.org"
> 	<meersbrook-house at email-lists.org>
> Subject: [meersbrook-house] re publicity
> Message-ID: <DUB128-W1407D75A99FEAFEF013EE9C5D40 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Can I have the exact wording for papers etc so I can distribute including what contact details I give with it to be published.  Also if someone wants to do an interview who will be spokesperson and do interview? 
> I just want to be absolutely sure I have everything correct before forwarding it on.
> Joy Bullivant   		 	   		  
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://www.email-lists.org/pipermail/meersbrook-house/attachments/20140819/82cfca47/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:06:30 +0100
> From: Nick Roscoe <nick at nickroscoe.com>
> To: meersbrook-house <meersbrook-house at email-lists.org>
> Subject: Re: [meersbrook-house] re publicity
> Message-ID:
> 	<CA+sCQFYVbb8h-ohYXf5s6SxnbcQ=9jB12fRWkvmKrW5CaUJ92w at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> I've been away, thought I had caught up with the emails but this last one
> about press releases, representatives and interviews seems a departure from
> where I thought we were at.  I don't think it would be good timing to do
> these now.
> 
> I thought Liz's wording was a good basis for a leaflet in so far as it
> pointed out the concerns that residents have - it puts people in the
> picture.  60 people turned up to that first meeting after very little
> publicity. My impression was that this was mostly on the back of concerns
> for the future of Meersbrook Hall and the possibility that SCC might sell
> off this chunk of Meersbrook Park - a public asset, ignoring the
> restrictive covenants.  I've been meaning to suggest some wording for that
> and will do.   Leaflets- thicker ones are easier to deliver!  (A5 160gsm
> would be my choice)  I've used Solopress for leaflet lots of times - not
> the cheapest, but fast and reliable.    For a domain name I think
> www.meersbrookhall.org.uk should definitely be bagsied   Facebook Page
> rather than group - but again, maybe these decisions can wait for now and
> we should just focus on the meeting.
> 
> To return to the  'self selected group' thing - I think Cate was perfectly
> entitled to say this.  I relayed this comment because it focusses attention
> on the need for us to put locals in the picture and to record a full and
> clear expression of the local reaction to the prospect of the sale of
> Meersbrook Hall. There needs to be no doubt about local opinion and no
> chance of it being misrepresented.
> 
> Once/if a public consultation is announced things would be quite progressed
> and it will probably be too late to change the views of decision makers.
>  They are weighing things up now with Meersbrook Hall and the fate of this
> building and twenty or so other pieces of land and property are also now
> being determined.  We can be aiming to talk constructively now with SCC and
> it's representatives,  we should get as many 'Friends of Meersbrook Hall'
> as possible and the aims and objs they sign up to support should reject the
> sale to private interests of part of a public part, a public asset, given
> to the people of Sheffield on condition it remains their property.  On the
> other hand, as has been discussed, our aims and objs should project a
> positive vision for the future of the Hall with the Friends working
> together with SCC
> 
> I think the ideal scenario in the short term is we persuade SCC to postpone
> the Parks Dept move out of the building, to give this group a chance to get
> its act together and form viable proposals.  I believe that should be our
> target for now, and once we have a substantial membership signed up to
> robust aims and objectives, and a decent management committee, then we are
> in a stronger position to begin asking for that. This can be done
> discretely without the need for local press coverage which always has the
> potential to stir things up where politics is concerned.  We need the
> support of locals and that can be established by leafleting and the public
> meeting. We also want the support of local Councillors and I think that is
> best achieved by not shouting until we need to.  Also, you only get so many
> shots with press releases - better to wait until there is something more
> news worthy and there is a management committee and a clearer direction.
> 
> Nick
> 
> 
> On 19 August 2014 00:20, Joyce M Bullivant <1duckweed at live.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> > Can I have the exact wording for papers etc so I can distribute including
> > what contact details I give with it to be published.  Also if someone wants
> > to do an interview who will be spokesperson and do interview?
> >
> > I just want to be absolutely sure I have everything correct before
> > forwarding it on.
> >
> > Joy Bullivant
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > meersbrook-house mailing list
> > meersbrook-house at email-lists.org
> > https://www.email-lists.org/mailman/listinfo/meersbrook-house
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://www.email-lists.org/pipermail/meersbrook-house/attachments/20140819/d7acf21c/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> meersbrook-house mailing list
> meersbrook-house at email-lists.org
> https://www.email-lists.org/mailman/listinfo/meersbrook-house
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of meersbrook-house Digest, Vol 3, Issue 18
> ***********************************************
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.email-lists.org/pipermail/meersbrook-house/attachments/20140819/b0b30f2f/attachment.html>


More information about the meersbrook-house mailing list