<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"><html><head><meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"></head><body>Obi wrote <The SE London PA will be sending delegates, shall I forward this idea to them to see what happens?><br/><br/>And Andria wrote <I can endorse it at North London PPA??><br/> <br/>It would be excellent if people can take it forward in whatever ways, and wherever they think will be most effective. Which may mean, in practice, 'making it hard to ignore'<br/><br/>There are just over 2 weeks to the deadline for resolutions to be submitted by local PAs / other qualifying groups (see original attachments in first email in thread) so there is just enough time to get it considered...<br/><br/>Questions to ask: when is your local PA meeting? Who do you know in the area who would be an ally in getting them to adopt and promote it? Andria as you may recall I was at the North London PA first meetings and there were lots of participative minded folk there then - but where are they now? Can you get them to join in support in case you need allies? I know for example there was Rhiannon, Laura and Billy. Obi as I recall there were also similar thinking activists at the SE London PA, as indeed there were at all the others. If they were still around, or reachable then the task would be that much easier. <br/><br/>Also, another question to ask : How do they, your local PA make decisions, who are the convenors and what kind of political character do they have? <br/><br/>Another, what other groups could be persuaded to take it up? They are entitled to do so and send delegates to the Conference if they are affiliated to the PA movement. <br/><br/>Again there are details of what kinds of organisation (other than an affiliated local PA) is entitled to submit resolutions and send delegates is in the documentation attached to the 1st message I sent on this thread. As you'll see there, local groups have a high delegate entitlement and are supposed to send delegates from a range of organising traditions - including horizontal. And imo the resolutions that get proposed too should reflect this diversity. However it is up to us to use our gumption in order to have a chance of making it so.<br/><br/>Cheers <br/><br/>Mark<div>Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone</div><hr/><div><b>From: </b> Lorenzo Abadinas <madman8london@gmail.com>
</div><div><b>Sender: </b> occupy-manchester@googlegroups.com
</div><div><b>Date: </b>Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:53:14 +0000</div><div><b>To: </b>lsxcampeconomics@googlegroups.com<lsxcampeconomics@googlegroups.com></div><div><b>ReplyTo: </b> occupy-manchester@googlegroups.com
</div><div><b>Cc: </b>Em Weirdigan<elf@weirdigans.co.uk>; Elf Weirdigan<elfweirdigan@googlemail.com>; occupylondon<occupylondon@lists.riseup.net>; Andria E-M<andriae4@gmail.com>; assembly-discuss@lists.appropriatesoftware.org<assembly-discuss@lists.appropriatesoftware.org>; rdwg@googlegroups.com<rdwg@googlegroups.com>; <occupycomms@email-lists.org><occupycomms@email-lists.org>; peoplesassemblies<peoplesassemblies@googlegroups.com>; campaignforrealdemocracy@lists.aktivix.org<campaignforrealdemocracy@lists.aktivix.org>; <education-workers@lists.riseup.net>; Freedom Assembly<freeassembly@lists.riseup.net>; peopleincommon@lists.riseup.net<peopleincommon@lists.riseup.net>; occupy-manchester@googlegroups.com<occupy-manchester@googlegroups.com>; Jacquelyn Howard<jaxaward@gmail.com></div><div><b>Subject: </b>[occupyMCR] Re: [OccupyLondon] URGENT! - Agitating for a
Participatory Democracy Debate in the PAAA</div><div><br/></div><div dir="ltr"><div>Much clearer. <br><br></div><div>The SE London PA will be sending delegates, shall I forward this idea to them to see what happens? <br><br></div><div>Yours Respectfully. <br></div>Obi </div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr"><div></div><a href="https://twitter.com/OccupyNN" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/Obi_Live</a><br><a href="https://twitter.com/OccupyTTIP" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/OccupyTTIP</a><br>
<a href="mailto:occupylondon@lists.riseup.net" target="_blank">occupylondon@lists.riseup.net</a> <br><br></div></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 6 February 2014 17:01, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marknbarrett@googlemail.com" target="_blank">marknbarrett@googlemail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<u></u><div><div class="im">Em wrote: <br><br>>Mark, can you explain in a very short amount of words what you're asking for? Sorry, I've read that twice and am not quite sure... <<br><br></div>Yes. Sorry about that. <br>
<br>Here goes:<br><br>(1) Please support the following Motion (or a locally adapted version) to be endorsed at the National PAAA Conference. These must go in to the Conference via your local PA and/or affiliated local (or national) anti-cuts group or other affiliated campaign organisation. The deadline to submit resolutions to the National Conference is 22 Feb so that's the amount of time we have to convince relevant groups to support it. <br>
<br>(2) Ideally also get yourself / another supporter sent to the Conference (March 15) as a delegate in order to support the Motion on the day. Each affiliated org can send up to 10 delegates (and submit up to 2 resolutions)<br>
<br>Here is the Resolution, drafted for Manchester PA to consider, but easily adapted to another grouping or area: <br><div class="im"><br>MOTION TITLE: The People’s Assembly should exercise participatory democracy<br><br>
ZONE: Structure<br><br>This conference notes:<br><br>1. The turn out in the 2010 UK general election was 65.1%. <br>2. Manchester Central had the lowest turnout at 44.31%.<br><br>This conference believes:<br><br>1. People feel increasing disenfranchised from our political system where they feel their vote does not count & their voice is not heard. <br>
2. People feel that politicians do not make decisions in the interest and well being of the people and the planet. Instead protecting the wealth and power of their friends and corporations.<br>3. The current centralized ‘system' is undemocratic and a major factor in how those in power are able to operate.<br>
4. There is an alternative, participatory democracy. The case for this is based a new way of doing politics as exemplified by Occupy & 15M. <br>5. The People’s Assembly has an opportunity to lead by example and use it as a way to strengthen and grow the movement and foster a wider engagement with politics.<br>
<br>This conference resolves:<br><br>6. To work towards incorporating participatory democracy and consensus decision-making across the PAAA.<br><br>7. To work towards a decentralized structure.<br><br>8. To establish a working group to look at the implementation of participatory democracy across the PAAA.<br>
<br>Word Count: 208<br>(196 without headers)<br><br>Submitted by: Michelle Lanaway, <a href="mailto:michmanchester@gmail.com" target="_blank">michmanchester@gmail.com</a><br><br></div>I hope that's clearer!<br><br>Mark <div class="im">
<div>Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone</div><hr></div><div><b>From: </b> Em Weirdigan <<a href="mailto:elf@weirdigans.co.uk" target="_blank">elf@weirdigans.co.uk</a>>
</div><div><b>Sender: </b> <a href="mailto:elfweirdigan@googlemail.com" target="_blank">elfweirdigan@googlemail.com</a>
</div><div><b>Date: </b>Thu, 6 Feb 2014 15:49:36 +0000</div><div><b>To: </b>occupylondon<<a href="mailto:occupylondon@lists.riseup.net" target="_blank">occupylondon@lists.riseup.net</a>>; Andria E-M<<a href="mailto:andriae4@gmail.com" target="_blank">andriae4@gmail.com</a>></div>
<div><b>Cc: </b>Mark Barrett<<a href="mailto:marknbarrett@googlemail.com" target="_blank">marknbarrett@googlemail.com</a>>; <a href="mailto:assembly-discuss@lists.appropriatesoftware.org" target="_blank">assembly-discuss@lists.appropriatesoftware.org</a><<a href="mailto:assembly-discuss@lists.appropriatesoftware.org" target="_blank">assembly-discuss@lists.appropriatesoftware.org</a>>; <a href="mailto:lsxcampeconomics@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">lsxcampeconomics@googlegroups.com</a><<a href="mailto:lsxcampeconomics@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">lsxcampeconomics@googlegroups.com</a>>; <a href="mailto:rdwg@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">rdwg@googlegroups.com</a><<a href="mailto:rdwg@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">rdwg@googlegroups.com</a>>; <<a href="mailto:occupycomms@email-lists.org" target="_blank">occupycomms@email-lists.org</a>><<a href="mailto:occupycomms@email-lists.org" target="_blank">occupycomms@email-lists.org</a>>; peoplesassemblies<<a href="mailto:peoplesassemblies@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">peoplesassemblies@googlegroups.com</a>>; <a href="mailto:campaignforrealdemocracy@lists.aktivix.org" target="_blank">campaignforrealdemocracy@lists.aktivix.org</a><<a href="mailto:campaignforrealdemocracy@lists.aktivix.org" target="_blank">campaignforrealdemocracy@lists.aktivix.org</a>>; <<a href="mailto:education-workers@lists.riseup.net" target="_blank">education-workers@lists.riseup.net</a>>; Freedom Assembly<<a href="mailto:freeassembly@lists.riseup.net" target="_blank">freeassembly@lists.riseup.net</a>>; <a href="mailto:peopleincommon@lists.riseup.net" target="_blank">peopleincommon@lists.riseup.net</a><<a href="mailto:peopleincommon@lists.riseup.net" target="_blank">peopleincommon@lists.riseup.net</a>>; <a href="mailto:occupy-manchester@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">occupy-manchester@googlegroups.com</a><<a href="mailto:occupy-manchester@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">occupy-manchester@googlegroups.com</a>></div>
<div><b>Subject: </b>Re: [OccupyLondon] URGENT! - Agitating for a Participatory Democracy
Debate in the PAAA</div><div><div class="h5"><div><br></div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Mark, can you explain in a very short amount of words what you're asking for? Sorry, I've read that twice and am not quite sure...<br>
<br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Em<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>@emweirdigan<br></div><div>@gathering_green<br></div>
<div><br></div></div></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Andria E-M <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andriae4@gmail.com" target="_blank">andriae4@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><div>Mark<br><br></div>we have the next OL Strategy meeting Feb 22nd, so if others are agreeable, we could prepare a motion for that day yeh?<br><br>Any takers, apart from Julie, mark n me?<br><br>Andria<br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 6 February 2014 11:14, Mark Barrett <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marknbarrett@googlemail.com" target="_blank">marknbarrett@googlemail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Dear All<br><br>I am re-sending this as a gentle or in some cases 1st reminder / point of info. <div><br>
</div><div>If you would like to see a debate within the PAAA about participatory democracy, both locally but also at the inaugural National Conference (the sovereign body of the movement) taking place on March 15th, there is a way to make it happen. This is because of some hard work done behind the scenes in order to give us a fighting chance. For example, following interventions in the Signatories group meetings, all PAs have been told (see attachment 3 on electing delegates) and should be reminded they'be been told of the following : <br>
<br>"..For the process to be democratic we also need to ensure respect and support for different organising approaches and demonstrate a commitment to transparency and accountability. <br><br>To ensure the different currents in the Peoples' Assemblies movement are treated fairly and able to play their full part, where practical we welcome local Peoples Assemblies sending delegates from all elements of the movement: the variety of anti-cuts campaigns, the trades and student unions, the Labour Party, Green Party, the horizonalist organising groups, the revolutionary left and, most important of all, those who simply oppose austerity and are in no organised group at all other than the People’s Assembly. So, in the delegate entitlement of 10 for a local Peoples Assembly, please try and reflect the diversity of traditions in the movement."<br>
<br>So on this basis why not approach your local PAAA group (however you have found it before). They are duty bound to support delegates from across the organising spectrum and also to consider what motions they would like to support. Also, other groups who are affiliated with the PAAA can send quite a few delegates and also put forward resolutions. As you will see at attachment 2 (PAAA Conference Pack):<br>
<br>"1. Who can submit a motion<br><br>Motions will only be accepted from recognised delegations and not from individuals.<br><br>2. Delegation Entitlement<br><br>For clarity, delegation entitlement is as follows:<br>
<br>a. Every local People's Assembly: a maximum of 10 delegates.<br><br>b. Local and regional union trade union organisations, including trades councils and students’ unions: 2 delegates<br><br>c. Local anti-cuts campaigns that are recognised signatories of the People’s Assembly: 2 delegates.<br>
<br>d. National trade unions: 10 delegates<br><br>e. National campaign organisations: 5 delegates."<div><br></div><div>Finally see below, and Attachment 1 where a resolution HAS ALREADY BEEN WRITTEN for us (by an Occupier) to take to local PAs and also other campaign groups who are affiliated. Why not take it, as is and get the thing into the movement so its members are forced / given the wonderful opportunity (depending on your point of view) to properly consider it! </div>
<div><br></div><div>NB <b>The deadline for resolutions to be submitted to the PAAA is midnight on 22nd February. <br></b>---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>Dear All<br><br>Attached is a Motion on Participatory Democracy drafted by Occupier Michelle, and which she hopes to persuade the Manchester PA (who she has worked with a bit already) to take forward into the National PA Conference in London on 15th March.<br>
<br>Other local PAs or groups affiliated with the PAAA movement are free to take the motion forward into the March event, either in its existing form or amended (however, presumably it will be stronger coming from more than one place in the exact same form) and we hope local PA and other affiliated groups are persuaded to do so. If you are up for taking it forward into your local PA or other group, please let us know.<br>
<br><b>The deadline for resolutions to be submitted to the PAAA is midnight on 22nd February. <br></b> <br>In love and solidarity<span><font color="#888888"><br><br>Mark </font></span></div></div><div>PS a note about the new PAAA web-site. the page <a href="http://www.thepeoplesassembly.org.uk/recall_conference" target="_blank">http://www.thepeoplesassembly.org.uk/recall_conference</a> </div>
<div>does not presently show the two official documents and I am assuming this is because of the change to a new site in recent weeks (the page does refer to the Pack but doesn't appear to contain it) - I will chase this so you can have reference to these docs as and when you approach your local groups as it's important to have what you are referring to in writing to support your case, no? Hence the positive aspects of the ideal of a written constitution innit ;) </div>
<span><font color="#888888">
</font></span></div><span><font color="#888888">
</font></span></blockquote></div><span><font color="#888888"><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><br>Andria<br><br><br>“Harm reduction” is often made an unnecessarily controversial issue as if there was a contradiction between prevention and treatment on one hand and reducing the adverse health and social consequences of drug use on the other. This is a false dichotomy. They are complementary.<br>
<br> Taken From UNODC (2008) Reducing the adverse health and social effects of drug use: A comprehensive approach.<br><div></div>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<p></p>
-- <br>
<br>
--- <br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lsxcampeconomics" group.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href="mailto:lsxcampeconomics%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">lsxcampeconomics+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.</font></span><div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><br>
For more options, visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out" target="_blank">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
<p></p>
-- <br />
-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Occupy Manchester" group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to occupy-manchester@googlegroups.com<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to occupy-manchester+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<br />
For more options, visit this group at <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/occupy-manchester?hl=en">http://groups.google.com/group/occupy-manchester?hl=en</a><br />
<br />
--- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Occupy Manchester" group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to occupy-manchester+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />
For more options, visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br />
</body></html>